�鶹������ý

In this mini-chat, Jeff Reichman of talks with Jen Rice, City Hall reporter at , about evictions in Harris County, Texas during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Between September 2020 and April 2021, Jen attended hundreds of eviction court hearings and spoke with dozens of tenants at risk of losing their home in Houston. Despite the existence of the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) eviction moratorium—the federal policy intended to keep tenants housed during the pandemic—Jen saw eviction filings moving forward, either because judges were not to upholding the moratorium or because tenants did not declare it in the first place.

What quickly became clear was that the narrative pushed by city officials—that the CDC moratorium was protecting tenants during this time—did not match the reality on the ground. And whether protection was extended hinged on a factor completely outside a tenant’s control: the individual judge presiding over the hearing.

Jen knew that what she was seeing play out in court houses across Houston were not one-off experiences, but a collective failure to protect vulnerable tenants. But how could she rewrite the narrative for the public without detailing each court case and each tenant's individual circumstances?

Jen found her answer through the , which was created and maintained by January Advisors and provides daily eviction data since the beginning of 2020. This dashboard allowed Jen to see how many evictions were being filed daily, despite the moratorium. This data backed up what tenants were sharing anecdotally—that the CDC moratorium was not only failing to stop eviction filings in Harris County, but that eviction filings were actually higher during the moratorium than before it.

The presents de-identified data from the Harris County Justice of the Peace Court from January 1, 2020 to present day. Members of the public can see heat maps of the number of evictions filed, as well as case level details (e.g., plaintiff, status of case, claim amount, neighborhood, court), top filers (the number of eviction cases filed by landlord), and details of upcoming cases scheduled for a hearing.

In subsequent , Jen relied on this data to weave the experiences of tenants with near real-time data on eviction filings to illustrate the scale of the trauma. In particular, there were three things Jen wanted the public to understand about pandemic-era evictions:

1. The CDC moratorium did in Houston;
2. Individual judges are a in who gets CDC protection; and
3. Houston elected officials made to allow pandemic evictions, including setting a grace period with no real enforcement teeth.

Both Jen and Jeff describe Houston as a place with good data and weak renter protections. The ability to share the consequences of the latter is closely tied to the quality and accessibility of the former.

For more information on the Harris County Eviction Dashboard, contact Jeff Reichman at jeff@januaryadvisors.com. To contact Jen about her reporting, email jrice@houstonpublicmedia.org.

During this mini-chat, Caitlin Augustin of speaks with Frank Wells of about building a housing response to evictions in Central Florida during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Frank and other housing stakeholders in Central Florida watched as CARES Act funding dried up by the end of July 2020. With no additional federal support in sight, no real safety net in place, and ad hoc extensions to the local eviction moratorium, Frank and colleagues knew that the tenants in Central Florida needed a plan in place—one that was responsive, comprehensive, and kept people housed.

In September 2020, Frank and colleagues convened a broad swath of housing organizations as part of an (EFG) for an inclusive conversation around housing loss prevention. The group included city and county leaders, the court system, legal aid partners, housing nonprofits, service providers, and the regional apartment association. The contributions of this diverse group of stakeholders, though they may seem like strange bedfellows, speaks to the power of collaboration during times of crisis.

Each stakeholder in the EFG contributed data on the housing crisis facing Central Floridians. To understand the scope of the issue, a county court judge shared up-to-date information on how many eviction filings were taking place. To better understand whether existing solutions were offering sufficient protection, legal aid lawyers shared how often a CDC declaration—the signed form required for a judge to contemplate halting an eviction as part of the moratorium—was made on behalf of a tenant. The apartment association also shared information on how many tenants had payment plans with landlords.

The variation in the types of data illustrates the complexity of eviction processes, and highlights how no data source alone can provide a comprehensive understanding of its impact. By stitching together different pieces of data, the EFG knew more collectively than individually.

But still, major gaps persist. As housing and social service organizations retool to deliver emergency rental assistance as quickly as possible, there is still a disconnect between the communities most in need and the communities most able to access resources. Data that shows where evictions are filed and where rental assistance is distributed, for example, could highlight this gap, and drive us towards a more equitable housing system both during and beyond the pandemic.

For more information on the EFG, contact Frank Wells at frank@thebrightway.org, and for more information on DataKind, contact Caitlin Augustin at caitlin@datakind.org.

In this mini-chat, Peter Hepburn—an assistant professor of sociology at Rutgers University-Newark and research fellow at the —spoke with Salmun Kazerounian from about the proactive ways eviction data is being used to further tenant outreach and advocacy statewide during the pandemic.

Salmun and the CT Fair Housing Center have been collecting Connecticut eviction data since it became electronically available at the start of 2017. When the pandemic hit, they pivoted from downloading one-time snapshots of eviction data to tracking eviction trends in real time. Salmun even developed a script that updated a local, queryable eviction database on a daily basis.

It may not have been clear how this data would be deployed at the start of the pandemic, but readily-accessible data became critical when the immediate safety of tenants was threatened just a few months later.

In fall 2020, the Connecticut court system began processing eviction cases filed prior to the start of the pandemic, despite the CDC moratorium in place. With eviction case data at the ready, Salmun generated a list of eviction cases moving through the courts that resulted in a writ of execution (or court-ordered removal from one’s home). By distributing these lists to three of the state’s major housing-related legal service agencies, advocates were able to contact every tenant household at imminent risk of eviction and inform them of their rights under the CDC moratorium.

What made this outreach effort more successful than most was the ability to target resources towards the tenants most at risk. Knowing where to expend efforts on data collection, and when to leverage it to keep people housed, is critical to using housing data proactively. The good news is that with good data, and with ready access to that data, this is something that is within reach for all advocates.

The CT Fair Housing Center used data to show who has an attorney in housing court–landlords or tenants. During the first three months of 2021, 86 percent of landlords were represented by an attorney in court while only 4.7 percent tenants had legal representation. These stark differences were deployed by advocates, journalists and legal aid providers in the growing fight to extend guaranteed right to counsel for every tenant facing eviction, culminating in a providing attorneys to low-income tenants. The bill passed through the Connecticut House of Representatives in early May and was signed into law in June.

Salmun and his colleagues are also building a disparate impact case to show that using a prior eviction to deny housing to tenants disproportionately harms communities of color and violates the Federal Fair Housing Act. Black and Latinx communities and women are significantly more likely to face evictions, and as a consequence, any screening policy that limits access to housing based on an eviction record perpetuates harm to these communities and bakes racial and gender inequities into the housing system.

Data is paramount to mitigating the harms caused by evictions in the short term while also building the case for reshaping the role evictions play in our housing system over the long term.

For more information on the Eviction Lab, contact Peter Hepburn at phepburn@princeton.edu. To contact Salmun about his work, email skazerounian@ctfairhousing.org.