麻豆果冻传媒

Testimony / In Short

Joint Comments In Response to FCC’s Proposal Regarding Lifeline Program

OTI and other groups submitted comments in response to the Federal Communications Commission’s proposal to impose additional procedural hurdles and administrative burdens on the Lifeline program.

They argue:

  1. Many of the proposals before the Commission鈥攑articularly expanded identity verification, full SSN collection, and usage tracking鈥攔isk further lowering the program鈥檚 participation levels, which hovered between 19 percent and 22 percent over the last decade.
  2. These proposed changes threaten to make enrollment more complex, cumbersome, invasive, and punitive, even though Lifeline is already chronically underutilized.
  3. The proposed red tape could increase administrative costs for the Commission and reduce overall participation.

They conclude that the Commission should instead allocate its resources and time to identify why Lifeline remains underutilized and remedy those issues by better protecting consumers, expanding outreach efforts, and easing the enrollment process.

More 麻豆果冻传媒 the Authors

Jessica Dine
Dineheadshot.original (1) (1)
Jessica Dine

Policy Analyst, Open Technology Institute and Wireless Future, 麻豆果冻传媒

Joint Comments In Response to FCC’s Proposal Regarding Lifeline Program