麻豆果冻传媒

In Short

Prioritizing Family Engagement to Support DLLs

family-engagement-dlls_image.jpeg

Family engagement is such an important support for students鈥 success (see

and

) that it鈥檚 often thought of as simple common sense. But when speaking broadly about family engagement, we often forget that different subgroups of students have different needs.

Dual language learners (DLLs) are no exception. Consider this: around and . Furthermore, DLLs are . Reaching DLLs鈥 families requires that schools meaningfully grapple with these factors. For instance, engagement with many DLLs鈥 families will require schools to develop capacity for outreach in their home languages.

Despite these challenges, DLLs bring strong social capital to school. are more likely to live in two-parent households than are non-immigrant children (and children who speak a non-English language at home are also than native English speakers to have two parents at home). Additionally, research shows that Latino children arrive at preschool with .

So how can schools get engagement with DLLs鈥 families right 鈥 especially in the early years? In a recent report from Columbia University鈥檚 National Center for Children in Poverty, , researchers Sandra Barrueco, Sheila Smith, and Samuel A. Stephens present research on family engagement practices that have proven effective with linguistically diverse families. They found that early learning centers should: Some early education centers here in Washington, D.C. have been extremely successful in designing and implementing programs to engage the parents of DLLs. Both and serve primarily low-income families and substantial numbers of DLLs. At Briya, 93 percent of the students are DLLs and all are low-income. At AppleTree鈥檚 Columbia Heights campus, 24 percent are DLLs and 99 percent of all students are low-income.

  1. encourage home-based learning through demonstration sessions 鈥 either at home, during individual parent-teacher meetings, or through group parenting sessions 鈥 where parents can practice what they learn and receive feedback;
  2. give parents materials 鈥 such as books, informational pamphlets, and math kits 鈥 聽to carry out home-based learning activities and include guidance in parents鈥 native language on how to use them;
  3. emphasize the value of home-based interactions in the children鈥檚 home language; and 聽
  4. create welcoming school environments so that families from similar cultures create social networks or support groups 鈥 schools can do this by hosting family events and school-based parent leadership programs where parents share best parenting practices with each other.

Both schools provide demonstration sessions for parents so they can support their children鈥檚 learning at home. For example, Briya 鈥 聽which serves children 0 to 5 and adults 鈥 integrates (PACT). The parenting classes develop parents鈥 literacy and language skills and also teach them techniques to support their children鈥檚 development. Later PACT sessions let them practice what they鈥檝e learned.

AppleTree鈥檚 efforts look somewhat different, but serve the same purpose. It runs a family literacy program that includes periodic Family Nights. These combine structured and engaging parent-child activities with literacy activities, and teach parents how to replicate those interactions at home. For example, during AppleTree鈥檚 week-long series, nutritionists share healthy eating tips and habits and encourage healthy cooking at home. They also engage immigrant parents by incorporating activities with food from their countries of origin. Importantly, the school partners with D.C.鈥檚 , the , and , meaning that the initiative comes at no cost to the school.

Both schools also provide parents with materials to encourage home-based learning. Briya sends home a weekly family newsletter that is available in English and Spanish. It includes highlights of PACT activities, vocabulary words with corresponding visuals, and questions intended to instigate meaningful dialogue. AppleTree has a lending library, which has books in all the home languages represented by the students. Teachers pair books with scaffolded activities to encourage and facilitate parent-child reading time. This comes at a small cost to the school, which buys most of its books from a local used book store that sells them for as little as two dollars each!

Additionally, Briya鈥檚 program includes classes that teach parents how to use technology, complete health and work forms, and learn English. How does it maintain such high levels of parent involvement? At Briya, parent engagement is not an option 鈥 it鈥檚 a requirement. Parents sign an agreement that commits them to dedicating 12 hours each week to engagement activities including PACT time, story time, library visits, parent-teacher conferences, home visits, as well as parenting, computer, and English classes.

Both schools have been recognized for their models. AppleTree was awarded an grant in 2010 by the Department of Education, which it used to further develop and implement its . Additionally, know 25 percent more letters upon entering Kindergarten, demonstrate better oral reading fluency in first grade, and perform better on oral reading in second grade than other peers. Briya has also seen great success: student language/literacy, mathematics, and social-emotional learning (SEL) scores are , and SEL scores reach 100 percent! Although it鈥檚 difficult to attribute these schools鈥 success solely to their family engagement models, it鈥檚 safe to say that these models are at least modest contributors.

So what can other early care centers serving DLLs learn from Briya鈥檚 and AppleTree鈥檚 models? First, both schools blend funding from federal, local, and private sources. As charter schools in D.C., they benefit from the District鈥檚 heavy investment in significant . Next, AppleTree Schools have the unique advantage of being supported by the , which conducts rigorous research to develop innovative solutions to close the achievement gap.

While not all schools have these advantages, they can learn from these schools鈥 partnerships with community-based organizations. For example, both partner with the to conduct home visits, and Briya partners with 鈥 a community health center that serves underserved populations 鈥 to provide health and social services for their families.

Although early care centers face resource and language challenges (among others) when implementing family engagement programs targeted to DLLs, Briya and AppleTree prove that these obstacles are not insurmountable. To really prepare our young DLLs for future success, other early education centers should learn from places like Briya and AppleTree that have intentionally prioritized family engagement and incorporated it as an integral component of their programs.

This post is part of 麻豆果冻传媒鈥檚 Dual Language Learner National Work Group. . To subscribe to the biweekly newsletter, , enter your contact information, and select 鈥淓ducation Policy.鈥"

More 麻豆果冻传媒 the Authors

Isabella Sanchez
Prioritizing Family Engagement to Support DLLs