Civil Society Urges Another Inspector General Investigation After FBI Encryption Misrepresentations
Today, 麻豆果冻传媒鈥檚 Open Technology Institute and a coalition of 20 other civil society organizations urging him to investigate the failures that led the FBI to massively overstate the number of encrypted devices it was unable to unlock. The FBI and the Justice department repeatedly relied on the erroneous figure in support of their claims that the FBI is 鈥済oing dark鈥 and needs a mechanism to ensure it can access encrypted information.
The coalition also urged the IG to investigate why Justice Department officials, including Attorney General Jeff Sessions, continued to use the flawed statistics after the FBI discovered the miscalculation.
On May 22, the that although the that it in 2017, the number was significantly inflated . The accurate count is likely closer to 1,200 devices. Despite learning of this miscalculation in April, and at least continued using the flawed data point in public remarks and when speaking to the press as recently as May 8.
The FBI鈥檚 miscalculation and the Justice Department鈥檚 continued use of the inflated number after it knew or should have known that it was flawed raise serious questions about their credibility in the debate about encryption backdoors. The coalition noted that this 鈥渋nvestigation would be an appropriate follow-up to regarding the FBI鈥檚 conduct in connection with the encrypted phone in the San Bernardino shooting investigation鈥 which 鈥渃oncluded that the FBI 鈥榥ot [to] pursue all possible avenues in the search for a solution鈥 when trying to unlock the San Bernardino shooter鈥檚 iPhone.鈥 In the , the coalition urges the IG to investigate:
鈥1. The causes that led the FBI to make such a significant error, how it was identified, and why it took so long to identify;
鈥2. Why Justice Department officials, including the Attorney General, used the data point when it was known to be false, and whether, after learning of the error, the Attorney General, other Justice Department, or FBI officials continued improperly using it in public remarks, conversations, or meetings (internal and external); and
鈥3. What measures the Justice Department and the FBI have taken to ensure that they inform lawmakers and the public of this significant miscalculation, both prior and subsequent to the publication of the Washington Post story, and whether those steps were sufficient.鈥
The full text of the letter is available .
The following statement can be attributed to Robyn Greene, policy counsel and government affairs lead at 麻豆果冻传媒鈥檚 Open Technology Institute:
鈥淚t is imperative that the Inspector General investigate the circumstances around the FBI鈥檚 massive failure in calculating the number of encrypted devices it couldn鈥檛 unlock, and the Justice Department鈥檚 conduct after it knew or should have known the number was false. The FBI has spent years claiming it is 鈥済oing dark鈥 and needs an encryption backdoor, in spite of nearly universal warnings by privacy advocates, security experts, and industry that such a 鈥渟olution鈥 would severely threaten privacy, cybersecurity and the U.S. economy. Now we know that the only proof that the FBI has ever offered to substantiate its demands鈥攖hat it couldn鈥檛 unlock 7,775 devices in 2017鈥攚as inflated by about 550%. This latest misstep, combined with the Inspector General鈥檚 conclusion that the FBI intentionally slow-rolled its efforts to unlock the San Bernardino shooter鈥檚 encrypted iPhone, makes clear that everyone should be seriously questioning the FBI鈥檚 credibility and reliability in the encryption debate.鈥